2024 Shaw Classic Lightweight Men’s Results

The 2024 Shaw Classic occurred on Aug. 16-18, 2024, in Loveland, CO. In addition to the 2024 Strongest Man on Earth contest won by Mitchell Hooper, the Shaw Classic featured Open and Weight Division competitions for strongmen and strongwomen.

In the Lightweight Men’s division, featuring athletes who weigh under 231.5 pounds, Alec Soukup scored the overall gold with 62.5 of a possible 70 points over the nine other strongmen in his class. The 10 lightweight strongmen competed in the Log Lift, Farmer’s Walk, Sack & Sled Medley, Dumbbell Press, Power Stairs, Hummer Tire Deadlift, and Atlas Stones.

2024 Shaw Classic Lightweight Men’s Results

Alec Soukup (USA) — 62.5 points

Matthew McQuiston (USA) — 55.5 points

John Alimo (USA) — 50 points

Richard Moczygemba (USA) — 49 points

Jack Turner (USA) — 40.5 points

Philip Brinkman (USA) — 36 points

Josh Harrelson (USA) — 34 points

Nick Strauss (USA) — 24.5 points

Harry Walker (USA) — 18 points

Blake Hoffman (USA) — 15 points

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Women’s Results]

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Men’s Results]

2024 Shaw Classic Lightweight Men’s Event Results

Below are the results of the seven contested events in Loveland:

Log Lift

Athletes had one minute to rep 125 kilograms as many times as possible.

Alec Soukup — 10 reps

Matthew McQuiston — Nine reps (T-second)

Jack Turner — Nine reps (T-second)

John Alimo — Six reps

Richard Moczygemba — Five reps (T-fifth)

Josh Harrelson — Five reps (T-fifth)

Nick Strauss — Five reps (T-fifth)

Blake Hoffman — Five reps (T-fifth)

Harry Walker — Four reps

Philip Brinkman — Two reps

Farmer’s Walk

Athletes were allotted one minute to carry 125 kilograms and 147 kilograms for 15 meters each.

Philip Brinkman — 16.28 seconds

Matthew McQuiston — 17.37 seconds

Alec Soukup — 18.55 seconds

John Alimo — 20.5 seconds

Josh Harrelson — 21.96 seconds

Richard Moczygemba — 22.52 seconds

Nick Strauss — 25 seconds

Jack Turner — 26.26 seconds

Blake Hoffman — 32.15 seconds

Harry Walker — 43.43 seconds

Sack & Sled Medley

Strongmen had to carry 113- and 136-kilogram sacks for 12 meters each before sled pushing 12 meters to the finish line.

Alec Soukup — 25.92 seconds

John Alimo — 29.55 seconds

Richard Moczygemba — 29.66 seconds

Matthew McQuiston — 29.92 seconds

Josh Harrelson — 30.17 seconds

Harry Walker — 31.23 seconds

Philip Brinkman — 32.16 seconds

Blake Hoffman — 32.58 seconds

Jack Turner — 34.81 seconds

Nick Strauss — 37.26 seconds

Dumbbell Press

With 75 seconds on the clock, each strongman attempted to press the 84-kilogram dumbbell for reps.

Matthew McQuiston — Seven reps

Alec Soukup — Six reps (T-second)

John Alimo — Six reps (T-second)

Richard Moczygemba — Six reps (T-second)

Jack Turner — Five reps

Nick Strauss — Four reps

Philip Brinkman — Three reps

Josh Harrelson — Two reps (T-eighth)

Blake Hoffman — Two reps (T-eighth)

Harry Walker — One rep

Power Stairs

Athletes were tasked with ascending 159-, 181-, and 204-kilogram implements five stairs each within the 75-second time cap.

Matthew McQuiston — 31.78 seconds

Philip Brinkman — 46.70 seconds

Alec Soukup — 69.16 seconds

Richard Moczygemba — 13 stairs

Jack Turner — 12 stairs

Nick Strauss — 12 stairs

John Alimo — 11 stairs

Josh Harrelson — 10 stairs

Harry Walker — 10 stairs

Blake Hoffman — 10 stairs

Hummer Tire Deadlift

Athletes established their max deadlift.

John Alimo — 386 kilograms

Alec Soukup — 374 kilograms (T-second)

Richard Moczygemba — 374 kilograms (T-second)

Jack Turner — 352 kilograms

Josh Harrelson — 329 kilograms

Matthew McQuiston — 318 kilograms (T-sixth)

Harry Walker — 318 kilograms (T-sixth)

Philip Brinkman — 318 kilograms (T-sixth)

Nick Strauss — 306 kilograms

Blake Hoffman — 295 kilograms

Atlas Stones

With 60 seconds on the clock, each strongman attempted to load five stones weighing 136 to 181 kilograms as quickly as possible.

Alec Soukup — Five in 27.99 seconds

Jack Turner — Five in 38.25 seconds

Richard Moczygemba — Five in 42.65 seconds

Matthew McQuiston — Five in 45.12 seconds

Josh Harrelson — Five in 54.24 seconds

John Alimo — Four in 23.69 seconds

Philip Brinkman — Four in 25.76 seconds

Harry Walker — Three in 23.05 seconds

Nick Strauss — Three in 23.28 seconds

Blake Hoffman — Two in 11.17 seconds

More Strongman Content

Every Accessory Exercise Strongman Martins Licis Trains During Contest Prep

Are You Doing Progressive Overload WRONG? Mitchell Hooper Teaches the Right Way

Learn the Dumbbell Clean & Press for Full-Body Strength and Power

Featured image: @theshawclassic on Instagram

The post 2024 Shaw Classic Lightweight Men’s Results appeared first on BarBend.

2024 Shaw Classic Women’s Open Results

The 2024 Shaw Classic occurred on Aug. 17-18, 2024, in Loveland, CO. In addition to the 2024 Strongest Man on Earth contest won by Mitchell Hooper, the Shaw Classic featured Open and Weight Division competitions for strongmen and strongwomen.

The 2024 Shaw Classic Women’s Open division was won by Canada’s Melissa Peacock, who scored 57.5 of a possible 70 points. The contest comprised seven events: Log Lift, Farmer’s Walk, Sack & Sled Medley, Dumbbell Press, Power Stairs, Hummer Tire Deadlift, and Atlas Stones.

2024 Shaw Classic Women’s Open Results

Melissa Peacock (CAN) — 57.5 points

Nicole Genrich (AUS) — 47.5 points

Nadia Stowers (USA) — 45.5 points

Erin Murray (USA) — 45.5 points

Nancy Johnson (USA) — 38.5 points

Jackie Osczevski (CAN) — 37 points

Ashley Crawford (USA) — 37 points

Jennifer Lyle (USA) — 34.5 points

Jackie Rhodes (USA) — 26.5 points

Laura de Berdt Romilly (CAN) — 15.5 points

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Women’s Results]

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Men’s Results]

2024 Shaw Classic Women’s Open Event Results

Below are results of the seven contested events in Loveland:

Log Lift

Athletes had one minute to rep 91 kilograms as many times as possible.

Melissa Peacock — Eight reps

Nadia Stowers — Seven reps

Erin Murray — Seven reps

Nancy Johnson — Seven reps

Jennifer Lyle — Five reps

Jackie Rhodes — Five reps

Laura de Berdt Romilly — Four reps

Nicole Genrich — Four reps

Jackie Osczevski — Three reps

Ashley Crawford — Two reps

Farmer’s Walk

Each strongwoman had to farmer’s carry 102 kilograms and 113 kilograms for 15 meters each as quickly as possible in the 60-second time cap.

Ashley Crawford — 22.56 seconds

Jackie Osczevski — 22.67 seconds

Nicole Genrich — 21.27 seconds

Jackie Rhodes — 28.77 seconds

Erin Murray — 29.05 seconds

Nadia Stowers — 29.15 seconds

Nancy Johnson — 32.9 seconds

Laura de Berdt Romilly — 38.54 seconds

Jennifer Lyle — 29.41 meters

Melissa Peacock — 28.19 meters

Sack & Sled Medley

With one minute on the clock, athletes attempted to carry a 102-kilogram sack and a 125-kilogram sack for 12 meters each and then sled push for 12 meters.

Melissa Peacock — 34.66 seconds

Erin Murray — 36.38 seconds

Nancy Johnson — 40.21 seconds

Nicole Genrich — 40.85 seconds

Jackie Osczevski — 42.5 seconds

Ashley Crawford — 43.65 seconds

Jennifer Lyle — 43.81 seconds

Nadia Stowers — 35.51 meters

Laura de Berdt Romilly — 24.38 meters

Jackie Rhodes — 14.25 meters

Dumbbell Press

Athletes were allotted 75 seconds to lift a 57-kilogram dumbbell for reps.

Nadia Stowers — Eight reps

Melissa Peacock — Seven reps (T-second)

Nicole Genrich — Seven reps (T-second)

Jennifer Lyle — Six Reps (T-fourth)

Jackie Rhodes — Six reps (T-fourth)

Erin Murray — Four reps

Jackie Osczevski — Three reps

Nancy Johnson — Two reps (T-eighth)

Ashley Crawford — Two reps (T-eighth)

Laura de Berdt Romilly — One rep

Power Stairs

Athletes were charged to ascend three implements weighing 102, 125, and 147 kilograms five stairs.

Melissa Peacock — 26.97 seconds

Erin Murray — 28.75 seconds

Ashley Crawford — 29.44 seconds

Jackie Osczevski — 31.59 seconds

Nancy Johnson — 33.41 seconds

Jennifer Lyle — 34.3 seconds

Nadia Stowers — 35.11 seconds

Nicole Genrich — 35.83 seconds

Laura de Berdt Romilly — 41.78 seconds

Jackie Rhodes — 68.5 seconds

Hummer Tire Deadlift

Athletes established their max deadlift.

Nadia Stowers — 318 kilograms (T-first)

Jennifer Lyle — 318 kilograms (T-first)

Melissa Peacock — 295 kilograms

Nicole Genrich — 283 kilograms (T-fourth)

Ashley Crawford — 283 kilograms (T-fourth)

Erin Murray — 272 kilograms (T-sixth)

Jackie Rhodes — 272 kilograms (T-sixth)

Nancy Johnson — 249 kilograms

Jackie Osczevski — 238 kilograms

Laura de Berdt Romilly — 227 kilograms

Atlas Stones

Athletes had one minute to load five stones weighing 102 to 147 kilograms.

Melissa Peacock — Five in 43.42 seconds

Nicole Genrich — Five in 46.63 seconds

Jackie Osczevski — Four in 22.32 seconds

Nancy Johnson — Four in 23.96 seconds

Nadia Stowers — Four in 27.09 seconds

Ashley Crawford — Four in 44.25 seconds

Erin Murray — Three in 17.11 seconds

Laura de Berdt Romilly — Three in 19.79 seconds

Jennifer Lyle — Two in 11.72 seconds

Jackie Rhodes — Two in 14.98 seconds

More Strongman Content

Every Accessory Exercise Strongman Martins Licis Trains During Contest Prep

Are You Doing Progressive Overload WRONG? Mitchell Hooper Teaches the Right Way

Learn the Dumbbell Clean & Press for Full-Body Strength and Power

Featured image: @theshawclassic on Instagram

The post 2024 Shaw Classic Women’s Open Results appeared first on BarBend.

2024 Shaw Classic Men’s Open Results

The 2024 Shaw Classic occurred on Aug. 16-18, 2024, in Loveland, CO. The main event was the 2024 Strongest Man on Earth contest, won by Mitchell Hooper. The Shaw Classic also featured Open and Weight Class competitions for strongmen and strongwomen.

Josh Spurgeon of the USA won the 2024 Shaw Classic Men’s Open contest, scoring 52.5 of a possible 70 points against nine other elite strongmen. The 10 athletes competed in the Log Lift, Farmer’s Walk, Sack & Sled Medley, Dumbbell Press, Power Stairs, Hummer Tire Deadlift, and Atlas Stones.

2024 Shaw Classic Men’s Open Results

Josh Spurgeon (USA) — 52.5 points

Nicholas Guardione (USA) — 50 points

Tim Buck (USA) — 47 points

Joey Lavallée (CAN) — 45 points

Andrew Burton (USA) — 43.5 points

James Jeffers (CAN) — 37.5 points

Alexander Kopp (USA) — 36 points

Nicholas Smith (USA) — 25 points

Jon Furrh (USA) — 23 points

Josh Gregory (USA) — 12.5 points

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Women’s Results]

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Men’s Results]

2024 Shaw Classic Men’s Open Event Results

Below are the results for each of the seven events contested in Loveland:

Log Lift

Athletes had 60 seconds to lift 147 kilograms as many times as possible.

Tim Buck — Eight reps

Nicholas Guardione — Seven reps

Alexander Kopp — Six reps (T-third)

Josh Gregory — Six reps (T-third)

Joey Lavallée — Five reps (T-fifth)

Andrew Burton — Five reps (T-fifth)

Josh Spurgeon — Four reps (T-seventh)

James Jeffers — Four reps (T-seventh)

Jon Furrh — Three reps

Nicholas Smith — Two reps

Farmer’s Walk

Each strongman had 60 seconds to carry 147 kilograms and 170 kilograms, 15 meters each.

Joey Lavallée — 17.83 seconds

Nicholas Guardione — 19.47 seconds

Andrew Burton — 19.98 seconds

Josh Spurgeon — 20.54 seconds

James Jeffers — 24.52 seconds

Jon Furrh — 27.36 seconds

Nicholas Smith — 38.75 seconds

Josh Gregory — 46 seconds

Alexander Kopp — 49.78 seconds

Tim Buck — 21.59 meters

Sack & Sled Medley

Each strongman had one minute to traverse a 36-meter course comprised of a 136-kilogram sack carry, a 159-kilogram sack carry, and a 12-meter sled push.

Andrew Burton — 33.22 seconds

Tim Buck — 33.87 seconds

Josh Spurgeon — 34.12 seconds

Nicholas Smith — 34.29 seconds

Alexander Kopp — 34.31 seconds

Jon Furrh — 34.72 seconds

Nicholas Guardione — 35.03 seconds

James Jeffers — 37.40 seconds

Josh Gregory — 37.41 seconds

Joey Lavallée — 39.69 seconds

Dumbbell Press

Athletes were allotted 75 seconds to lift 102 kilograms for reps.

Joey Lavallée — Five reps

Josh Spurgeon — Four reps

Tim Buck — Four reps

Alexander Kopp — Four reps

Nicholas Guardione — Three reps

Andrew Burton — Three reps

James Jeffersno lift

Nicholas Smithno lift

Jon Furrhno lift

Josh Gregory — no lift

Power Stairs

Each athlete had 75 seconds to ascend implements weighing 181, 204, and 227 kilograms five stairs.

Nicholas Guardione — 33.81 seconds

James Jeffers — 36.83 seconds

Josh Spurgeon — 36.95 seconds

Joey Lavallée — 38.4 seconds

Tim Buck — 41.78 seconds

Nicholas Smith — 51.13 seconds

Andrew Burton — 14 stairs

Alexander Kopp — 12 stairs

Jon Furrh — 12 stairs

Josh Gregory — withdrew

Hummer Tire Deadlift

Each strongman established their max deadlift.

Josh Spurgeon — 442 kilograms

Joey Lavallée — 431 kilograms (T-second)

Andrew Burton — 431 kilograms (T-second)

James Jeffers — 420 kilograms

Nicholas Guardione — 408 kilograms (T-fifth)

Alexander Kopp — 408 kilograms (T-fifth)

Tim Buck — 374 kilograms (T-seventh)

Nicholas Smith — 374 kilograms (T-seventh)

Jon Furrh — 374 kilograms (T-seventh)

Josh Gregory — withdrew

Atlas Stones

The Atlas Stones event comprised five stones weighing 159 to 204 kilograms.

Tim Buck — Five in 45.18 seconds

James Jeffers — Five in 54.13 seconds

Josh Spurgeon — Four in 27.1 seconds

Nicholas Guardione — Four in 38.78 seconds

Alexander Kopp — Three in 17.47 seconds

Nicholas Smith — Three in 17.2 seconds

Joey Lavallée — Three in 19.38 seconds

Andrew Burton — Three in 23.54 seconds

Jon Furrh — Four in 34.15 seconds

Josh Gregory — withdrew

More Strongman Content

Every Accessory Exercise Strongman Martins Licis Trains During Contest Prep

Are You Doing Progressive Overload WRONG? Mitchell Hooper Teaches the Right Way

Learn the Dumbbell Clean & Press for Full-Body Strength and Power

Featured image: @theshawclassic on Instagram

The post 2024 Shaw Classic Men’s Open Results appeared first on BarBend.

These 3 Bench Press Mistakes Are Killers, Says Jeff Nippard

You might have the worst bench press on the planet if you do these three things,” says content creator and coach Jeff Nippard.

We aren’t sold just yet, but we’ll hear what Nippard has to say and then determine whether his fixes will help you increase strength or build muscle.

And don’t worry — you probably don’t have the “worst bench” on Earth if you’re guilty of one or more of these three bench press mistakes. Even if you are, you’re about to learn how to fix them.

Not touching your chest with the bar

Letting your spotter do all the work

Pressing the bar in the wrong direction


1. Not Touching Your Chest

“If you don’t touch your chest with the bar, you’re probably lifting too heavy,” Nippard said on social media on Aug. 15, 2024.

He’s right — ego lifting will get you nowhere fast, but there are other reasons you may not be touching your chest with the bar on the bench press.

You may have heard that bench pressing is dangerous for your shoulders, but studies show that powerlifters who bench competitively don’t have a high rate of injury compared to most contact sports. (1)

[Related: Best Pre-Workout Supplements for Chest Day]

Nippard argued partial-range-of-motion training is one of the biggest bench press mistakes because, “that’s where most of the muscle growth comes from.”

He’s right; studies tell us that stretching a muscle under load is (probably) optimal for growth, (2) and your pecs experience the biggest stretch in the bottom half of the bench press.

If you have trouble touching your chest when you bench, play around with your grip width and make sure you’re arching your back as well to increase stability in your shoulder girdle. 


2. Letting Your Spotter Do the Work

Spotters are invaluable when it comes to safety, but one of the most nefarious bench press mistakes you can make is turning your bench press workouts into a biceps workout for your spotter.

“If your spotter’s bicep pump is better than your chest pump, they’re doing too much,” Nippard remarked.

Spotters are helpful for motivation and some research has shown that bodybuilders utilize hypertrophy training techniques like forced reps to maximize muscular size. (3)

[Related: Best Supplements for Muscle Growth]

Nippard advised not letting your spotter touch your barbell unless it starts moving down instead of up, and we agree.

You might also want to ask them to stand clear unless they need to spring into action; the gym is a sweaty place after all, and you don’t want anybody standing directly over your face. That’s bad gym etiquette.


3. Pressing in the Wrong Direction

If your bench press bar path moves away from your shoulders, rather than toward them, Nippard thinks you might be leaving gains on the table.

“If you’re training for max strength, you’ll want to press the bar up and back slightly,” said Nippard.

[Related: Best Wrist Wraps for the Bench Press]

As far as bench press mistakes go, this one might be the most subtle. But it matters — strength researcher Greg Nuckols has discussed the importance of an angular bar path during the bench press to ensure the load is stacked vertically atop the wrist, elbow, and shoulder joints.

Nippard noted that a straight up-and-down bar path is fine too if you’re benching mainly for chest hypertrophy, but you should never push the bar up and away from you. 

More Training Content

Do Different Row Grips Matter?

The Worst Gym Machines Your Workout Does NOT Need

How To Make Bodybuilding Gains With the Smith Machine

References

Dudagoitia Barrio, Ekaitz & Garcia de Alcaraz, Antonio & Andersen, Lars. (2021). Safety of powerlifting: A literature review. Science & Sports. 36. 10.1016/j.scispo.2020.08.003. 

Pedrosa GF, Lima FV, Schoenfeld BJ, Lacerda LT, Simões MG, Pereira MR, Diniz RCR, Chagas MH. Partial range of motion training elicits favorable improvements in muscular adaptations when carried out at long muscle lengths. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Aug;22(8):1250-1260. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1927199. Epub 2021 May 23. PMID: 33977835.

Krzysztofik M, Wilk M, Wojdała G, Gołaś A. Maximizing Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review of Advanced Resistance Training Techniques and Methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 4;16(24):4897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244897. PMID: 31817252; PMCID: PMC6950543.

Featured Image: @jeffnippard / Instagram

The post These 3 Bench Press Mistakes Are Killers, Says Jeff Nippard appeared first on BarBend.

2024 Strongest Man on Earth Results

The 2024 Strongest Man on Earth (SMoE) main evented the 2024 Shaw Classic in Loveland, CO, on Aug. 17-18, 2024. Sixteen of the world’s top strongmen converged in the midwest of the USA to partake in the competition promoted by four-time World’s Strongest Man (WSM) Brian Shaw.

After eight events — Max Deadlift, Overhead Medley, Keg Toss, Manhood Stones, Squat Lift, Wheelbarrow & Arm-Over-Arm Medley, Dumbbell Medley, and Fingal’s Fingers & Power Stairs Medley — Mitchell Hooper stood atop the podium with 117 of a possible 128 points.

2024 Strongest Man on Earth Results

Mitchell Hooper (CAN) — 117 points

Hafthór Björnsson (ISL) — 108 points

Lucas Hatton (USA) — 83 points

Trey Mitchell (USA) — 79.5 points

Austin Andrade (USA) — 75.5 points

Evan Singleton (USA) — 70 points

Tom Stoltman (UK) — 68.5 points

Bobby Thompson (USA) — 63.5 points

Wesley Derwinsky (CAN) — 61.5 points

Thomas Evans (USA) — 57 points

Maxime Boudreault (CAN) — 41 points

Mathew Ragg (NZL) — 40 points

Tristain Hoath (CAN) — 38 points

Aivars Šmaukstelis (LAT) — 38 points

Pavlo Kordiyaka (UKR) — 35 points

Oleksii Novikov (UKR) — 29.5 points

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Women’s Results]

[Related: 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Men’s Results]

2024 Strongest Man on Earth Event Results

Below are the results for each of the eight events contested in Loveland:

Max Deadlift

Athletes established their max deadlift. They were allowed to use lifting straps but not lifting suits.

Hafthór Björnsson — 450 kilograms

Mitchell Hooper — 438 kilograms

Austin Andrade — 436 kilograms (T-third)

Bobby Thompson — 436 kilograms (T-third)

Mathew Ragg — 429 kilograms

Evan Singleton — 420 kilograms

Trey Mitchell — 411 kilograms

Tom Stoltman — 409 kilograms

Wesley Derwinsky — 397 kilograms

Tristain Hoath — 393 kilograms

Lucas Hatton — 388 kilograms (T-11th)

Thomas Evans — 388 kilograms (T-11th)

Oleksii Novikov — 384 kilograms

Aivars Šmaukstelis — 372 kilograms

Pavlo Kordiyaka — 350 kilograms

Maxime Boudreault — 332 kilograms

Overhead Medley

With two minutes on the clock, each strongman attempted to lift a 163-kilogram log, a 170-kilogram axle, a 177-kilogram log, a 184-kilogram axle, and a 191-kilogram log.

Mitchell Hooper — Five in 100.33 seconds

Trey Mitchell — Five in 100.90 seconds

Tom Stoltman — Five in 112.56 seconds

Thomas Evans — Four in 77.74 seconds

Lucas Hatton — Three in 43.78 seconds

Austin Andrade — Three in 60.75 seconds

Maxime Boudreault — Three in 77.39 seconds

Bobby Thompson — Two in 19.51 seconds

Hafthór Björnsson — Two in 28.20 seconds

Pavlo Kordiyaka — Two in 28.71 seconds

Evan Singleton — Two in 31.1 seconds

Aivars Šmaukstelis — One in 5.56 seconds

Oleksii Novikov — One in 7.33 seconds

Mathew Ragg — One in 7.48 seconds

Wesley Derwinsky — One in 8.19 seconds

Tristain Hoath — One in 12.42 seconds

Keg Toss

Athletes established their max height toss with 15 kilograms.

Hafthór Björnsson — 7.77 meters

Mitchell Hooper — 7.32 meters (T-second)

Evan Singleton — 7.32 meters (T-second)

Tom Stoltman — 7.32 meters (T-second)

Wesley Derwinsky — 7.32 meters (T-second)

Thomas Evans — 7.32 meters (T-second)

Mathew Ragg — 7.32 meters (T-second)

Trey Mitchell — 6.71 meters (T-eight)

Austin Andrade — 6.71 meters (T-eight)

Bobby Thompson — 6.71 meters (T-eight)

Aivars Šmaukstelis — 6.71 meters (T-eight)

Pavlo Kordiyaka — 6.71 meters (T-eight)

Lucas Hatton — 6.1 meters (T-13th)

Tristain Hoath — 6.1 meters (T-13th)

Oleksii Novikov — 6.1 meters (T-13th)

Maxime Boudreault — 5.49 meters

Manhood Stones

With 90 seconds on the clock, each strongman lifted 204, 227, 249, or 272 kilograms for reps. Any single rep of a higher weight outranked any number of reps at a lighter weight.

Hafthór Björnsson — 249 kilograms, two reps

Austin Andrade — 249 kilograms, one rep

Mitchell Hooper — 249 kilograms, one rep

Trey Mitchell — 249 kilograms, one rep

Lucas Hatton — 227 kilograms, one rep

Thomas Evans — 204 kilograms, three reps

Evan Singleton — 204 kilograms, one rep

Tristain Hoath — 204 kilograms, one rep

Aivars Šmaukstelis — 204 kilograms, one rep

Tom Stoltmanno lift

Bobby Thompson — no lift

Wesley Derwinskyno lift

Maxime Boudreault no lift

Mathew Raggno lift

Pavlo Kordiyakano lift

Oleksii Novikov no lift

Squat Lift

Each strongman established their max reps with 368 kilograms.

Mitchell Hooper — 10 reps

Lucas Hatton — Five reps

Bobby Thompson — Four reps

Hafthór Björnsson — Three reps

Trey Mitchell — One rep (T-fifth)

Wesley Derwinsky — One rep (T-fifth)

Austin Andradeno lift

Evan Singletonno lift

Tom Stoltmanno lift

Thomas Evansno lift

Maxime Boudreaultno lift

Mathew Raggno lift

Tristain Hoathno lift

Aivars Šmaukstelisno lift

Pavlo Kordiyakano lift

Oleksii Novikovno lift

Wheelbarrow & Arm-Over-Arm Medley

There was a 90-second time cap to carry the wheelbarrow and complete the arm-over-arm pull as fast as possible. Scores below are written as which implement the athlete made it to and their farthest distance if they did not finish (DNF).

Hafthór Björnsson — DNF Pull, 34’5

Mitchell Hooper — DNF Pull, 32’5

Austin Andrade — DNF Pull, 30’1

Maxime Boudreault — DNF Pull, 27’2

Bobby Thompson — DNF Pull, 27′

Tristain Hoath — DNF Pull, 24’6

Wesley Derwinsky — DNF Pull, 24.5′

Tom Stoltman — DNF Pull, 21’11

Mathew Ragg — DNF Pull

Lucas Hatton — DNF Pull

Evan Singleton — DNF Pull

Pavlo Kordiyaka — DNF Pull

Thomas Evans — DNF Wheelbarrow

Aivars Šmaukstelis — DNF Wheelbarrow

Oleksii Novikov — DNF Wheelbarrow

Trey Mitchell — DNF Wheelbarrow

Dumbbell Medley

Within 90 seconds, athletes attempted to lift five dumbbells weighing 102, 109, 116, 122, and 129 kilograms as fast as possible.

Lucas Hatton — Five in 78.78 seconds

Oleksii Novikov — Four in 30.36 seconds

Mitchell Hooper — Three in 29.13 seconds

Trey Mitchell — Three in 33.43 seconds

Tom Stoltman — Three in 38.61 seconds

Pavlo Kordiyaka — Three in 40.28 seconds

Austin Andrade — Three in 43.63 seconds

Thomas Evans — Three in 63.98 seconds

Evan Singleton — Two in 11.94 seconds

Hafthór Björnsson — Two in 20.46 seconds

Maxime Boudreault — Two in 25.06 seconds

Wesley Derwinsky — Two in 28.73 seconds

Tristain Hoath — Two in 31.57 seconds

Mathew Ragg — Two in 32.93 seconds

Bobby Thompson — One in 7.09 seconds

Aivars Šmaukstelis — One in 8.42 seconds

Fingal’s Fingers & Power Stairs Medley

Each strongman attempted to flip two Fingal’s Fingers and ascend five stairs with 250- and 272-kilogram implements within the 90-second time cap.

Hafthór Björnsson — 45.27 seconds

Evan Singleton — 45.6 seconds

Tom Stoltman — 51.96 seconds

Mitchell Hooper — 61.15 seconds

Lucas Hatton — 63.26 seconds

Wesley Derwinsky — 64.21 seconds

Maxime Boudreault — 64.9 seconds

Trey Mitchell — Nine stairs

Tristain Hoath — Eight stairs

Aivars Šmaukstelis — Seven stairs

Austin Andrade — Six stairs

Bobby Thompson — Six stairs

Thomas Evans — Five stairs

Mathew Ragg — Five stairs

Pavlo Kordiyaka — Five stairs

Oleksii Novikov — Two fingers

More Strongman Content

Every Accessory Exercise Strongman Martins Licis Trains During Contest Prep

Mitchell Hooper Critiques Eddie Hall’s “16,000-Calorie” Strongman Diet

The 8 Worst Exercises for Strength, From the “Impractical” to the “Stupid”

Featured image: @theshawclassic on Instagram

The post 2024 Strongest Man on Earth Results appeared first on BarBend.

2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Women’s Results

The 2024 Official Strongman Games (OSG) European Championships were held in York, England, on Aug. 17-18, 2024. The strongwoman competition featured nine athletes representing three countries battling through five events: Deadlift, Farmer’s Walk, Sandbag Over Bar, Dumbbell Press, and Loading Race.

Rebecca Roberts of the UK emerged with the crown, scoring 42.5 of a possible 45 points. She was joined by her fellow countrywomen, Donna Moore, with the silver, and Katie Smith, with the bronze.

2024 OSG European Championships Women’s Results

Rebecca Roberts — 42.5 points

Donna Moore — 36 points

Katie Smith — 32.5 points

Patricia Smit — 22 points

Stephanie Dutton — 18 points

Maxine Winter — 16 points

Holly Ford — 12 points

Aisling Cunningham — 10.5 points

Stacey Pope — 4.5 points

[Related: Every Accessory Exercise Strongman Martins Licis Trains During Contest Prep]

[Related: The 8 Worst Exercises for Strength, From the “Impractical” to the “Stupid”]

2024 OSG European Championships Women’s Event Results

Below are the results of each of the five events contested in York:

Deadlift

Each strongwoman had one minute to lift an axle bar loaded to 230 kilograms as many times as possible.

Katie Smith — Eight reps

Rebecca Roberts — Seven reps

Donna Moore — Six reps

Patricia Smit — Three reps

Stephanie Dutton — One rep

Holly Ford — One rep

Aisling Cunningham — One rep

Maxine Winterno lift

Stacey Popeno lift

Farmer’s Walk

Athletes traversed a 32-meter course with 110 kilograms in hand as quickly as possible within the one-minute time cap.

Rebecca Roberts — 25.14 seconds

Katie Smith — 22.56 meters

Stephanie Dutton — 19.83 meters

Donna Moore — 16 meters

Patricia Smit — 12.47 meters

Maxine Winter — 7.83 meters

Holly Ford — 4.23 meters

Aisling Cunningham — 3.25 meters

Stacey Pope — 3.1 meters

Sandbag Over Bar

Each strongwoman loaded a 100-kilogram sandbag over a bar as many times as they could within 60 seconds.

Rebecca Roberts — Eight reps (T-first)

Katie Smith — Eight reps (T-first)

Donna Moore — Seven reps (T-third)

Patricia Smit — Seven reps (T-third)

Maxine Winter — Seven reps (T-third)

Stephanie Dutton — Five reps

Aisling Cunningham — Three reps (T-seventh)

Stacey Pope — Three reps (T-seventh)

Holly Ford — Two reps

Dumbbell Press

Athletes lifted a 60-kilogram dumbbell for reps within the 60 seconds time cap.

Donna Moore — Five reps

Rebecca Roberts — One rep

Katie Smithno lift

Patricia Smitno lift

Stephanie Duttonno lift

Maxine Winterno lift

Holly Ford — no lift

Aisling Cunningham — no lift

Stacey Popeno lift

Loading Race

Each strongwoman loaded three implements — a 100-kilogram tire, a 100-kilogram keg, and a 100-kilogram sack — across a 20-meter course for time.

Rebecca Roberts — Three in 47.45 seconds

Donna Moore — Three in 48.64 seconds

Katie Smith — Three in 58.62 seconds

Patricia Smit — Two in 47.85 seconds

Maxine Winter — Two in 40.46 seconds

Holly Ford — One in 13.64 seconds

Stephanie Dutton — One in 15.48 seconds

Aisling Cunningham — One in 25.69 seconds

Stacey Pope — One in 34.96 seconds

More Strongman Content

2024 Iceland’s Strongest Man Results

Mitchell Hooper Critiques Eddie Hall’s “16,000-Calorie” Strongman Diet

Get Lean, Get Strong, and Get Fast With the Yoke Walk

Featured image: @rebeccarobertsstrongwoman on Instagram

The post 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Women’s Results appeared first on BarBend.

Seeq Protein Powder Review (2024): Advice From an R.D.

While some love their protein powder in a thick milkshake-like consistency, others may prefer a lighter, juicy protein experience. Seeq Clear Protein Powder uses clear whey isolate you can mix with water for a refreshing post-workout drink. As a certified personal trainer and nutrition coach, I often recommend protein powder to help my clients reach their protein intake goals — and a high-quality whey protein isolate is one of the best protein powders you can get.

I like that Seeq Clear Protein offers an alternative to the classic milky protein shake. At BarBend, our team puts every product through a supplement testing methodology to deliver ratings. After taking this protein powder out for a spin and analyzing its ingredients, we love that it’s got more fruity (and delicious!) options than usual, made possible by clear whey protein — no more need for milk, just water, with your protein! Along with our expert tester and BarBend writer’s experience, let’s dive into this Seeq Protein Powder review so you can decide if clear protein is worth a try.

Editor’s note: The content on BarBend is meant to be informative in nature, but it should not be taken as medical advice. The opinions and articles on this site are not intended for use as diagnosis, prevention, and/or treatment of health problems. It’s always a good idea to talk to your doctor before beginning a new fitness, nutritional, and/or supplement routine. Individual needs for vitamins and minerals will vary.

Seeq Clear Protein

Seeq Clear Protein

This water-based protein supplement delivers more than 20 grams of protein per serving and contains no fat, sugar, or carbs. It’s also free of lactose, gluten, soy, and nuts. 
 

Shop Seeq

Experts Who Contributed

Jesse Zucker, NCSF CPT, CNC, RYT 200

Aimee Gershberg, RD, CN, CPT

Main Takeaways

Seeq Clear Protein Powder is a clear whey protein isolate that uses an ultra-filtration process to change milky whey protein to a clear protein. It mixes well with water to a juicy consistency and comes in nine fruity flavors.

Whey protein isolates can be easier to digest for lactose-sensitive folks, though no whey product is completely lactose-free.

Each serving provides 22 grams of high-quality, bioavailable whey protein isolate. The product is relatively low in calories and carbs and uses both artificial and natural sweeteners. 

Seeq Protein Powder Specs

Seeq Protein Powder is unique because it is a clear whey protein. Protein supplements can be chalky and thick, and Seeq uses an ultra-filtration process to distill the whey to a neutral base. Seeq came on the scene in 2018, and its clear protein products became popular on TikTok and social media. 

Seeq Clear Protein is a type of whey protein isolate, the most refined form of whey protein. Most of its fat, carbs, and lactose have been removed, so the remaining whey may be easier to digest. It is considered high-quality and complete because it contains all the amino acids your body needs to build muscle after training, and they can be rapidly absorbed. The bioavailability makes whey protein isolate one of the best protein powders for muscle gain. (1)

SEEQ Clear Protein Powder

A serving of Seeq Protein Powder contains 22 grams of protein, 0 grams of fat, 1 gram of carbohydrates, and 100 calories. Seeq Protein Powder also advertises 4.5 BCAAs (branched-chain amino acids) per serving, but BCAAs naturally occur in any complete protein source. (1)

The clear protein is great if you like it, but it doesn’t make it more pure than another whey protein isolate. Still, it’s gluten-free, comes in a wide variety of flavors, and contains no added sugar. However, it uses artificial and natural sweeteners (sucralose and Stevia) plus some extra ingredients like sunflower lecithin, polysorbate 80, and silicone for texture. Some people like to avoid these.

At $1.79 per serving — or $2.40 for limited edition flavors — it can get a bit pricey, but you’re paying to enjoy a refreshing spin on classic protein shakes. Our tester finds it quite refreshing. Seeq does not do third-party testing, and it is a newer company. 

Pros

Clear protein makes a juice-like consistency

Whey protein isolate may be easiest to digest

Diversity of flavors that customers and our tester enjoy

Gluten-free with no added sugar
Cons

Lower in grams of protein than competitors

Not completely lactose-free or vegan

Uses artificial sweeteners and additives

[Related: Protein Powder Benefits]

Who Should Use / Who Shouldn’t Use Seeq Protein Powder

Whey protein isolate is a convenient way to reach your protein goals and boost muscle recovery, muscle growth, and weight loss. Seeq Protein Powder is a specialized clear type; who should shell out for it?

Recommended for:

People who prefer a lighter and fruitier protein drink

People sensitive to lactose (but not necessarily intolerant) 

People who want to boost protein intake with low calories and carbs

Not Recommended for:

Lactose-intolerant or vegan folks

Anyone avoiding artificial sweeteners or additives

People looking to gain mass who may want higher protein and calories

Our Experience Using Seeq Protein Powder

You know the feeling — you just crushed a workout, and you want to kickstart muscle recovery with the best protein shake that is quick, convenient, and tasty. We turned to our ​​expert tester, BarBend editorial team member Rosie Bochert, for her take and ratings on the taste and solubility. As a certified nutrition coach, I’ll weigh in on how I rate the ingredients and formulation and examine safety and price.

Ingredients and Formulation

Seeq Protein Powder contains 22 grams of whey protein isolate. It’s a little low; some competitive brands go up to 30 grams. Still, whey isolate digests and absorbs well, so you’re likely to get a solid benefit out of the protein that is present.

Seeq says they use an “ultra-filtration” system to make it “clear,” though it doesn’t really differ from a regular whey protein isolate; it’s the selling point for folks who like a juice protein. 

Nutrition Facts label on a container of SEEQ

I like that Seeq doesn’t use artificial dyes or colors. The various flavors get their color from ingredients like spirulina powder, turmeric powder, red beet powder, and beta-carotene. However, they do use artificial and natural sweeteners, such as sucralose and Stevia, which some people opt to avoid. Seeq also contains silicone as an anti-foaming agent, which some folks don’t want to consume.

For all these reasons — a high-quality protein source and no fake colors, but some artificial sweeteners and additives — I’ll rate it a 4 out of 5.

Taste

Seeq Protein Powder boasts nine fun and fruity flavors: Sour Green Apple, Blue Razz Freeze, Watermelon Wave, Strawberry Lemonade, Fruit Punch, Mango Pineapple, Strawberry Daiquiri, Piña Colada, and Classic Margarita. They sound good, but how does the protein taste?

Our expert product tester, BarBend editorial team member Rosie Borchert, says: “I tried the Sour Green Apple flavor, and it hit the spot. This drink is delicious. I had it in the backyard on a hot day, and one night when my partner had a cocktail, I opted for this instead. It’s the type of drink you’d want to sip while lounging next to a pool. Refreshing. Tasty. I love it.”

Our tester sits outside drinking SEEQ

A non-alcoholic drink to sip outside while boosting your protein intake that tastes great? We’ll take it. 

For her rating, Borchert adds, “Taste scores a 5 out of 5. If I could give it more points, I would.”

Solubility

Let’s talk solubility — a juice protein sounds nice, but is it actually juicy, or do you get the dreaded clumps if you only have your shaker bottle?

Our expert tester and BarBend writer Rosie Borchert tells all: “I mixed with water, and I also mixed in some of my other supplements, like creatine and glutamine to see how it all mixed. Adding those in didn’t mess with the flavor or consistency at all.”

Gotta get your daily creatine in — I love that it mixed well and still tasted great.

[Related: Best Creatine Supplements]

Foam on top of SEEQ after mixing

Borchert adds that it mixes well overall: “When mixed with just water, it took me maybe a minute to get everything dissolved. In comparison, it took about 5 to 10 seconds in the blender bottle to accomplish the same thing.”

One minute isn’t bad for it to fully dissolve even without a blender (this is a protein powder we’re talking about!), and I love that Borchert could add her other supplements without any negative effects. It sounds like a 5 out of 5 on solubility to me.

Price Per Serving

A tub of Seeq Protein Powder costs $44.99 and contains 25 one-scoop servings, which is $1.79 per serving. If you subscribe through their website, it’s $38.24 per tub and $1.52 per serving — which isn’t terrible. Surprisingly, it is not much cheaper on Amazon.

Seeq is also offering three limited-edition flavors that are more expensive — $35.99 for a tub of 15 servings and $2.39 per serving.

Close to two dollars is on the higher end of the price per serving for a protein supplement, but whey protein isolates tend to be pricier anyway, and the clear protein adds an extra, unique twist. I rate it a 4 out of 5.

Third-Party Testing

We tend to opt for supplements that do third-party testing since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not regulate dietary supplements. They do not need to be proven safe or effective and may contain ingredients not listed on the label. (2)

Seeq is a newer company that does not seem to be third-party tested by a recognizable source. They even mention that they are not NSF Certified for Sport. However, they say they make their products in a GMP-compliant facility and undergo 5 to 7 days of testing to ensure there are no banned substances.

I’m giving it a 3 out of 5 since it sounds good but lacks evidence — and that’s key with supplements, according to registered dietitian and clinical nutritionist Aimee Gershberg.Since protein powders are technically dietary supplements, they are not regulated by the FDA, so there is no way to know for sure what a protein powder truly contains,” she explains. “It is best to look for a protein powder that is third-party tested.”

What To Consider Before Buying Seeq Protein Powder

The rule of thumb is to reach your protein intake goals through whole foods first and go to protein powder as your next step. A convenient protein boost for muscle recovery, building muscle, and losing fat are a few protein powder benefits that you’ve likely considered to land yourself here. 

Whey protein may also boost bone health, which is particularly important for cis women (and potentially trans women, but we need more research) who are more prone to osteoporosis. (3) So, whey is a solid choice if you’re looking for the best protein powders for women. Is Seeq Protein Powder the one for you? We’ve tested over 100 different protein supps, so we know what specs to consider. Here they are. 

Protein Content: Seeq Protein Powder contains 22 grams of whey protein isolate.

Fat and Carbs: Seeq has 1 gram of carbohydrates and 0 grams of fat.

Price: Seeq protein costs $1.79 per serving or $1.52 per serving if you do a subscription. The limited edition flavors cost $2.39 per serving. 

Sweeteners: Seeq contains the artificial sweetener sucralose and natural sweetener Stevia.

Micronutrient content: You get 15 to 90 milligrams of sodium, 9 to 70 (in the Green Apple flavor) milligrams of potassium, and 30 to 42 (Watermelon flavor) miligrams of calcium.

Third-party testing: Seeq does not have a notable third-party testing certification, like NSF for Sport. However, they state that their products go through a 5- to 7-day testing period to ensure no banned substances. 

Seeq Protein Powder Vs. Competitors

With plenty of options to choose from, we’ll compare the high-level specs of Seeq Protein Powder to the specs of two of the best whey protein powders out there. We chose Transparent Labs and Sports Research because they’re also whey protein isolates from quality companies that customers love. They also both do third-party testing, while Seeq’s testing is unclear.

Transparent Labs is the most expensive, but it also has the highest protein (28 grams), the most flavors, and the only one that doesn’t use artificial sweeteners—though it uses Stevia, considered a natural sweetener. Sports Research offers the cheapest price with less protein than Transparent Labs but more than Seeq.

The most significant difference is that Seeq is the only company of the three offering a clear protein. It also has the fewest calories. 

Places to Buy Seeq Protein

Seeqsupply.com

Amazon

Total Nutrition (ND, MT, WA)

All-Star Nutrition (MN)

Crunch Fitness (Locations in MN)

Customer Experience and Brand Reputation

Here’s what to expect if you give Seeq a chance. 

Shipping and Delivery:

Time: Orders are processed the same day you order before 10 AM, Monday through Friday. Orders placed over the weekend are processed on the next business day. Shipping can take two to five days to receive after processing. 

Price: Seeq offers free shipping on orders over $70. Standard shipping costs apply for orders under $70, and they are calculated at checkout.

Trial Period: Seeq does not offer returns or exchanges unless you prove the item is “damaged or defective.” Products are final sale. 

Customer Reviews:

Seeq Site: All of the Seeq Protein Powder flavors have a combined 620,000 reviews. Each flavor ranges from a 4.6 to 4.8 out of 5-star rating.

Amazon: There are 2,095 reviews for Seeq Protein Powder on Amazon and an average of 4.2 out of 5-star rating.

Customer Thoughts: Customers often mention Seeq Protein Powder is high-quality and mixes well. They enjoy the taste and protein content, while others say the protein is low for the price. 

Our Final Verdict on Seeq Protein 

If you’re looking for a lighter protein drink that’s more of a refreshing juice than a thick milkshake, Seeq Clear Protein Powder is a great choice. It’s high-quality whey protein isolate, and our testers love the fruity flavors and the fact that it mixes well. 

Seeq Protein Powder is lower in protein than cheaper competitors, so if you’re OK without the clear aspect, you might get more bang for your buck elsewhere. 

FAQs About Seeq Protein

Is Seeq worth the hype?

It’s up to you. The “clear protein” is a preference for what you look for in a protein drink, but according to our tester, definitely helps produce a tasty drink.

What kind of protein does Seeq use?

Seeq uses whey protein isolate.

Is Seeq protein 3rd party tested?

Seeq is not third-party tested, but the products undergo a “testing period” after being manufactured.

Does Seeq protein contain silicone?

Yes, Seeq Protein Powder contains silicone to help reduce foaming.

References

Hoffman JR, Falvo MJ. Protein – Which is Best? J Sports Sci Med. 2004 Sep 1;3(3):118-30. PMID: 24482589; PMCID: PMC3905294.

Ronis MJJ, Pedersen KB, Watt J. Adverse Effects of Nutraceuticals and Dietary Supplements. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Jan 6;58:583-601. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052844. Epub 2017 Oct 6. PMID: 28992429; PMCID: PMC6380172.

Kerstetter JE, Bihuniak JD, Brindisi J, Sullivan RR, Mangano KM, Larocque S, Kotler BM, Simpson CA, Cusano AM, Gaffney-Stomberg E, Kleppinger A, Reynolds J, Dziura J, Kenny AM, Insogna KL. The Effect of a Whey Protein Supplement on Bone Mass in Older Caucasian Adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jun;100(6):2214-22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3792. Epub 2015 Apr 6. PMID: 25844619; PMCID: PMC4454800.

The post Seeq Protein Powder Review (2024): Advice From an R.D. appeared first on BarBend.

2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Men’s Results

The 2024 Official Strongman Games (OSG) European Championships occurred in York, England, from Aug. 17-18, 2024. The competition featured strongman and strongwoman events. Fifteen strongmen representing eight countries battled through five events: Deadlift, Farmer’s Walk, Sandbag Over Bar, Dumbbell Press, and Loading Race.

Roman Grekov of Ukraine stood atop the podium, scoring 62 of a possible 75 points. Ben Glasscock of the UK ranked second, and Marek Czajkowski of Poland rounded out the podium.

2024 OSG European Championships Men’s Results

Roman Grekov (UKR) — 62 points

Ben Glasscock (UK) — 57 points

Marek Czajkowski (POL) — 54 points

Ryan Bennett (UK) — 51.5 points

Adam Roszkowski (POL) — 50.5 points

Jan Lacina (CZE) — 46 points

Oleg Pylypiak (UKR) — 45 points

Joachim Kvick (SWE) — 44.5 points

Cim Johansson (SWE) — 42.5 points

William Relf (UK) — 37.5 points

Anders Aslak (DEN) — 32.5 points

Paolo Acquaviva (ITA) — 23 points

Emanuele Greco (ITA) — 21.5 points

Kristján Níelsson (ISL) — 18.5 points

Chris Beetham (UK) — Seven points

[Related: Every Accessory Exercise Strongman Martins Licis Trains During Contest Prep]

[Related: The 8 Worst Exercises for Strength, From the “Impractical” to the “Stupid”]

2024 OSG European Championships Men’s Event Results

Below are the results for each of the five events contested in York:

Deadlift

Athletes had one minute to lift 320 kilograms on an axle bar as many times as possible.

Oleg Pylypiak — 10 reps

Roman Grekov — Nine reps

Ben Glasscock — Eight reps (T-third)

Marek Czajkowski — Eight reps (T-third)

Jan Lacina — Eight reps (T-third)

Ryan Bennett — Seven reps (T-sixth)

Joachim Kvick — Seven reps (T-sixth)

Adam Roszkowski — Six reps (T-eighth)

Emanuele Greco — Six reps (T-eighth)

Cim Johansson — Five reps (T-10th)

Chris Beetham — Five reps (T-10th)

Anders Aslak — Five reps (T-10th)

Paolo Acquaviva — Four reps

William Relf — Three reps (T-14th)

Kristján Níelsson — Three reps (T-14th)

Farmer’s Walk

Each strongman attempted to traverse the 32-meter course with 140 kilograms in hand in the fastest possible time. They had a time cap of 60 seconds.

Ryan Bennett — 19.68 seconds

Roman Grekov — 21.5 seconds

Adam Roszkowski — 22.16 seconds

Cim Johansson — 22.38 seconds

Ben Glasscock — 24.24 seconds

Emanuele Greco — 33.86 seconds

Paolo Acquaviva — 39.04 seconds

Joachim Kvick — 43.59 seconds

Marek Czajkowski — 43.91 seconds

William Relf — 51.72 seconds

Jan Lacina — 28.3 meters

Oleg Pylypiak — 27.22 meters

Anders Aslak — 24.72 meters

Kristján Níelsson — 27.22 meters

Chris Beetham — 3.1 meters

Sandbag Over Bar

Each athlete had one minute to lift a 150-kilogram sandbag as many times as possible in one minute.

Joachim Kvick — 11 reps

Cim Johansson — 10 reps (T-second)

Ben Glasscock — 10 reps (T-second)

Roman Grekov — Nine reps (T-fourth)

Marek Czajkowski — Nine reps (T-fourth)

Adam Roszkowski — Nine reps (T-fourth)

Jan Lacina — Nine reps (T-fourth)

Oleg Pylypiak — Seven reps (T-eighth)

Paolo Acquaviva — Seven reps (T-eighth)

Anders Aslak — Seven reps (T-eighth)

Ryan Bennett — Six reps (T-11th)

William Relf — Six reps (T-11th)

Kristján Níelsson — Five reps

Emanuele Greco — Four reps

Chris Beetham — Three reps

Dumbbell Press

With one minute on the clock, each strongman attempted to establish max reps with 100 kilograms.

Roman Grekov — Eight reps (T-first)

Oleg Pylypiak — Eight reps (T-first)

Ryan Bennett — Five reps (T-third)

Anders Aslak — Five reps (T-third)

Marek Czajkowski — Four reps (T-fifth)

William Relf — Four reps (T-fifth)

Ben Glasscock — Three reps (T-seventh)

Adam Roszkowski — Three reps(T-seventh)

Jan Lacina — Three reps (T-seventh)

Kristján Níelsson — Three reps (T-seventh)

Joachim Kvick — Two reps

Cim Johansson — One rep

Paolo Acquavivano lift

Emanuele Grecono lift

Chris Beetham — withdrew

Loading Race

Each strongman attempted to load a 110-kilogram tire, a 120-kilogram keg, and a 140-kilogram sack across a 20-meter course.

Roman Grekov — Three in 39.35 seconds

Ben Glasscock — Three in 35.54 seconds

Marek Czajkowski — Three in 35.39 seconds

Ryan Bennett — Three in 37.93 seconds

Adam Roszkowski — Three in 36.36 seconds

Jan Lacina — Three in 36.78 seconds

Oleg Pylypiak — Three in 44.88 seconds

Joachim Kvick — Three in 42.81 seconds

Cim Johansson — Three in 41.73 seconds

William Relf — Three in 34.34 seconds

Anders Aslak — Three in 43.65 seconds

Paolo Acquaviva — Three in 45.04 seconds

Emanuele Greco — Three in 57.54 secnods

Kristján Níelsson — Three in 54.87 seconds

Chris Beetham — withdrew

More Strongman Content

2024 Iceland’s Strongest Man Results

Mitchell Hooper Critiques Eddie Hall’s “16,000-Calorie” Strongman Diet

Learn the Dumbbell Clean & Press for Full-Body Strength and Power

Featured image: @grekov_strong on Instagram

The post 2024 Official Strongman Games European Championships Men’s Results appeared first on BarBend.

2024 Tupelo Pro Bodybuilding Show Results

The 2024 Tupelo Pro bodybuilding show was held on the weekend of Aug. 16-17, 2024, in Tupelo, MS. This show featured four IFBB Pro League divisions with 2024 Olympia Weekend qualifications going to the winners of those contests if they had not qualified already.

The champions coming out of this show were Kim Angel (Classic Physique), Rhea Gayle (Figure), Jeanette Johansson (Women’s Physique), and Jasmine Baker (Wellness). None of the four winners had previously qualified for the 2024 Olympia.

2024 Tupelo Pro Results

The final standings for all 68 competitors across the four contests are below, courtesy of the IFBB Pro League:

Classic Physique

Kim Angel (Spain)

Jeff Hallenbeck (United States)

Mahfuz Hawit (Honduras)

Alex Connors (Australia)

Joe Brighty (United Kingdom)

Victor Compan  (Mexico)

Damion Ricketts (United States)

Petar Duper (Italy)

Gabriel Aguirre (Mexico)

Michael Deangelis (United States)

Seth Goss (United States)

Abdul Gibbs (United States)

Michael Lopez (United States)

Mark Kenyon (United States)

Figure

Rhea Gayle (United Kingdom)

Deshane Price (United States)

Rita Villarreal (United States)

Gabriela Consolmagno (United States)

Nikki Mcguire (United States)

Mayra Rocha  (Mexico)

Jenny Kurth (Germany)

Gabriela Linhartova (Czech Republic)

Julia Waring (United States)

Adrienne Matthews (United States)

Tye Jones (United States)

Stephanie Mattern (United States)

Mariela Merced (Puerto Rico)

Jessica Cocke (United States)

Angela Baldwin (United States)

Tied for 16th

Patrina Mosca (United States)

Starr Parnell (United States)

Lauren Roussel (United States)

Women’s Physique

Jeanette Johansson (Sweden)

Lenka Ferencukova (Czech Republic)

Elena Aviles Romero (Spain)

Paula Ranta (Finland)

Alyssa Coppolino (Canada)

Modesta Halby (Denmark)

Sammica Cash (United States)

Santana Francisco (United States)

Farrah Faulkner (United States)

Shae Queen (United States)

Natalia Spierings (United Kingdom)

Michelle Suozzi (United States)

Diana Schnaidt (United States)

Luciana Esquilin (United States)

Samantha Emery (Canada)

Marketa Hildreth (United States)

Wellness

Jasmine Baker (New Zealand)

Simara Walter (Brazil)

Juliane Almeida (Brazil)

Amanda Burnett (United States)

Casey Goeckeritz Delong (United States)

Briaunna Guthrie (United States)

Maria Paulette (Spain)

Synara Santana  (Brazil)

Brooke Hackett (United States)

Madi Begley (United States)

Francesca Emanuele (United States)

Kimberly O’Connell (United States)

Quisha Hearn (United States)

Valesca Macedo (United States)

Hayley Overall (United Kingdom)

Tied for 16th

Normarie Fonseca (Puerto Rico)

Ruth Rodriguez (United States)

Kari Wold (United States)

Amanda Wright (United States)

Kenea Yancey (United States)

[Related: Why Ronnie Coleman Thinks Chris Bumstead Could Lose the 2024 Olympia]

[Related: Are Tempo Tri-Sets Chris Bumstead’s Trick for Thicker Hamstrings?]

Classic Physique Winner — Kim Angel

This was Angel’s first pro show since the 2022 season. His extended time off served him well as he scored his first pro win and Classic Physique Olympia qualification. The scorecards showed no doubt who the judges had for the win because he received a perfect score.

Figure Winner — Rhea Gayle

Gayle entered this show as the favorite and left the stage with the title and Figure Olympia qualification. This was her 2024 season debut. She was previously onstage at the 2023 Olympia, finishing in seventh place. This is her sixth overall win in the pro ranks.

Women’s Physique Winner — Jeanette Johansson

Johansson showed winning potential when she ranked third at the 2024 Texas Pro. Johansson has been a pro since 2018, but this is her first pro win. If she competes at the 2024 Women’s Physique Olympia, it will be her debut on that stage.

Wellness Winner — Jasmine Baker

Baker is a rookie in the pro ranks but pulled off the upset victory. This was her fourth pro show of the season. If she competes in the Olympia, it will be her debut on that stage. She will make history as the first athlete from New Zealand to compete in the Wellness Olympia.

More Bodybuilding Content

How Many Calories Are in Derek Lunsford’s 2024 Olympia Shredding Diet?

Try Ashley Lynette Jones’ Glute-Building Workout On Your Next Leg Day

Training in the Stretched Position for Muscle Growth: Experts Explain Why It Works

Featured Image: @djl.procoaching on Instagram 

The post 2024 Tupelo Pro Bodybuilding Show Results appeared first on BarBend.

The ONLY 2 Exercises for Abs You Need to Build a Six-Pack

“Um, actually, abs are made in the kitchen…”

You’ve probably heard that line before, but it’s not the whole story. Abs are also made in the gym

Everyone has six-pack abs. If you can’t see yours, you may need to lose a bit of body fat. But your abdominal muscles aren’t special; you can make them stronger and more visible by performing exercises for abs.

Here’s the best part — you don’t need to do core circuits, use fancy equipment, or dedicate half an hour a day to ab workouts, either. Two specific moves will do the trick.

We’re going to break down the only two exercises for abs you need to build a six-pack, and we’re going to do it in 500 words or less

Ab Anatomy, Explained

To understand why these are the only two exercises you need for abs, you need to grasp a bit of anatomy.

Credit: Satyrenko / Shutterstock

[Related: Best Fat Burners for Revealing Your Six Pack]

Your rectus abdominis muscle runs down the front of your torso, connecting your ribcage to your pelvis. One of its primary functions is to pull those two bones together. 

If your torso is locked in place but your legs can move, your abs contract to tilt your pelvis posteriorly; think of a hanging leg raise.

If your legs are subdued but you can move your torso, your abs pull your ribs down; think crunches

That’s why you only need two exercises for abs. One where your legs move and one where your torso moves. Anything else is extra credit.

The 2 Best Exercises for Abs

The only two abs exercises you need to build your six-pack are the decline crunch and decline reverse crunch. Why?

To do both exercises, all you need is an adjustable weight bench

Each exercise challenges your abs across a full range of motion.

Both exercises are loadable, so you can improve strength and definition alike.

1. Decline Crunch

How To Do It

Set the bench to a downward angle and lie on your back with your legs fixed against the pads.

Inhale and arch your spine to stretch your abs while holding your hands behind your head or clasping a weight in front of your face.

Exhale and crunch, lifting your shoulders off the bench and pushing your spine flush against the bench. 

Do’s & Don’ts: Exhale sharply as you lift your trunk, but don’t lift your entire torso off the bench.

Sets & Reps: 2-3 x 15-20

To properly activate your abs, arch and flatten your spine against the bench as you crunch.

To progress, you can adjust the angle of the bench or incorporate progressive overload by holding a weight plate or dumbbell. A steeper bench makes the exercise harder by reducing leverage; holding a weight adds extra tension and makes it easy to track progress. 

2. Decline Reverse Crunch

How To Do It

Lie on the bench with your legs mostly straight and your heels on the floor.

Grab the back of the bench, inhale, and arch your lower back.

Exhale, push your spine into the bench and lift your legs until your toes point toward the ceiling. 

Do’s & Don’ts: Lower your legs down slowly to stretch your abs. Don’t move your legs without tilting your pelvis, as that will limit ab activation and emphasize your hip flexors.

Sets & Reps: 2-3 x 10-15

To master your form, think about getting your butt off the bench as early as possible when lifting your legs and keeping it off the bench as long as possible as you lower your legs down.

To progress, pinch a small dumbbell between your knees, not your ankles. You can use heavier weights this way and there’s less temptation to activate your hip flexors. 

Why These Ab Exercises Work

With so many options for ab training out there — seriously, how many crunch variations have you tried? — the idea that you only need to do two, in the same place, with the same equipment, might sound too good to be true. 

At the end of the day, almost any core exercise for abs will work as long as you do them correctly and consistently. That said, there are a few specific reasons why we love the decline crunch and decline reverse crunch as a pair: 

Both exercises challenge your abs the most when the muscle is stretched. Scientific studies tell us that applying tension to a muscle in its lengthened position is integral for maximizing muscle growth. (1)

Neither exercise has a complicated technique or is dangerous. If you have pre-existing back issues, you may want to proceed cautiously, but studies tell us there’s no significant risk to flexing your spine. (2) It’s a series of joints just like the rest of your body, and joints are meant to move. 

You don’t need to run all over the gym doing five different exercises or scrambling for equipment. Almost all gyms have a standalone decline bench or a decline bench press station. 

If you don’t have access to an adjustable bench, you can do these two moves on the floor just fine. They just won’t work as well or for as long. 

Before you start thinking you’ve cracked the code on six-pack abs, remember that all the ab training in the world won’t help you see your abs if you’re carrying too much body fat. “Abs are made in the kitchen” is a half-truth. Your six-pack is built in the gym, but it’s revealed by following a proper diet, including a calorie deficit. 

More Training Content

Strength Training Works as Well as Stretching for Flexibility, Study Shows

The 8 Worst Exercises for Strength, From the “Impractical” to the “Stupid”

How To Get a V-Taper: Workouts & Training Tips From the Pros

References

Pedrosa GF, Lima FV, Schoenfeld BJ, Lacerda LT, Simões MG, Pereira MR, Diniz RCR, Chagas MH. Partial range of motion training elicits favorable improvements in muscular adaptations when carried out at long muscle lengths. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Aug;22(8):1250-1260. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1927199. Epub 2021 May 23. PMID: 33977835.

Schoenfeld, Brad & Kolber, Morey. (2016). Abdominal Crunches Are/Are Not a Safe and Effective Exercise. Strength and Conditioning Journal. 38. 1. 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000263. 

Featured Image: Serhii Bobyk / Shutterstock

The post The ONLY 2 Exercises for Abs You Need to Build a Six-Pack appeared first on BarBend.